<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[DUI with Medication - James Novak]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.arizonacriminaldefenselawyer.com/blog/categories/dui-with-medication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.arizonacriminaldefenselawyer.com/blog/categories/dui-with-medication/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[James Novak's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 17:02:15 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[“Motive” as a Reason to Admit Otherwise Inadmissible Evidence at Trial]]></title>
                <link>https://www.arizonacriminaldefenselawyer.com/blog/motive-as-a-reason-to-admit-otherwise-inadmissible-evidence-at-trial/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.arizonacriminaldefenselawyer.com/blog/motive-as-a-reason-to-admit-otherwise-inadmissible-evidence-at-trial/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[The Law Office of James Novak Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 17:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Domestic Violence]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[DUI with Medication]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Violent Crimes]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>When can an Arizona court admit evidence regarding a previous, seemingly unrelated offense during criminal proceedings? The answer is tricky, as there are multiple exceptions to the rule of evidence indicating that testimony about a prior bad act is inadmissible during trial. One such exception is when the evidence speaks to a party’s motive, opportunity,&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>When can an Arizona court admit evidence regarding a previous, seemingly unrelated offense during criminal proceedings? The answer is tricky, as there are multiple exceptions to the rule of evidence indicating that testimony about a prior bad act is inadmissible during trial. One such exception is when the evidence speaks to a party’s motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, or plan. In a recent case before the Arizona Court of Appeals, Division Two, the defendant successfully appealed his conviction by arguing that certain evidence at trial should have been admitted under this “motive” exception.</p>



<p><strong>Trial Proceedings</strong></p>



<p>In the <a href="https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-two-published/2024/2-ca-cr-2023-0046.html" rel="noopener" target="_blank">case</a> before the Arizona court, the defendant was originally charged with aggravated assault and domestic violence assault. The State charged him after his girlfriend, the victim in the case, called police officers indicating that the defendant had physically assaulted her. During the defendant’s trial, he tried to present evidence demonstrating that the victim had previously made multiple false allegations against him in an attempt to get the defendant into custody. The trial court told him he could not present this evidence, given that it was extrinsic and not relevant to the offense at issue. A jury later found the defendant guilty as charged.</p>



<p><strong>Appeal</strong></p>



<p>On appeal, the defendant argued the evidence should have been admitted, since it spoke to the victim’s motive in the case. The higher court agreed. Certain evidence of other crimes, said the court, may be admitted to show a person’s motive. Here, the victim’s prior fabrications could have established her intent to lie about the assault in the present case. This evidence could have made a difference in the outcome of the defendant’s case, as the jury would have been more likely to find him not guilty had it heard the evidence that was excluded.</p>



<p>The court vacated the defendant’s conviction and remanded the case back down to the trial court for further proceedings. The case serves as a powerful reminder that familiarity with Arizona rules of evidence can make or break the outcome of a trial. To give yourself the best possible chance of success, hire an experienced and aggressive Phoenix violent crimes attorney, one that can litigate your case with full knowledge of the evidence rules as well as the exceptions that a court might apply.</p>



<p><strong>Are You on the Lookout for a Phoenix Violent Crimes Attorney to Fight Your Charges?</strong></p>



<p>At the Law Office of James E. Novak, we make your priorities our priorities, and we make your acquittal our number one goal. If you are facing criminal charges in Arizona, there is no better choice for your representation. We have years of experience representing the accused, and our familiarity with the court system, rules of evidence, and various litigation strategies make us well poised to take on your case. For a free and confidential consultation with a qualified, experienced Phoenix <a href="/practice-areas/violent-crimes/">violent crimes</a> attorney, give our office a call today at 480-413-1499. You can also fill out our online form to have a member of our team get back in touch with you as soon as possible regarding your next steps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Marijuana DUI:  The Impact of Montgomery V. Harris in Arizona]]></title>
                <link>https://www.arizonacriminaldefenselawyer.com/blog/additional-resources-arizona/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.arizonacriminaldefenselawyer.com/blog/additional-resources-arizona/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[The Law Office of James Novak Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 21:05:44 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Arrests]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[DUI Laws]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[DUI with Medication]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Penalties]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[driving under the influence of Marijuana]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[drug DUI penalties]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Marijuana DUI laws]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Marijuana impairments while driving]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Arizona Court of Appeals rules non-impairing Marijuana ingredients qualify for DUI prosecution. A recent Marijuana DUI dismissal was overturned in favor of the state and moved for continued prosecution in the Arizona Court of Appeals. The main legal issue was whether or not a motorist could be prosecuted for Marijuana DUI when the only evidence&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>Arizona Court of Appeals rules non-impairing Marijuana ingredients qualify for DUI prosecution.</em></p>



<p>
A recent Marijuana DUI dismissal was overturned in favor of the state and moved for continued prosecution in the Arizona Court of Appeals.</p>



<p>
The main legal issue was whether or not a motorist could be prosecuted for <a href="http://www.novakazlaw.com/DUIDefense/MarijuanaDUI.aspx">Marijuana DUI</a> when the only evidence revealed on a blood test was an inactive chemical compound in Marijuana. In this case, the drug compound was one that does not cause impairment, “Carboxy-THC”.  This is  a residual compound known to stay in a person’s blood stream for 3 to 4 weeks after Marijuana use.
The inactive or non-impairing compound was examined in contrast to the known active ingredient THC or Tetrahydrocannabinol.  THC has been successfully argued in courts as one that causes driving impairment.</p>



<p>
The lower court dismissed the case before appeal, on the basis that the motorist was not  driving impaired.  But the Arizona Court of Appeals ruled that both the active compound and the inactive compound fall within Arizona DUI Law A.R.S. 28-1381, so the motorist could still be subject to prosecution.</p>



<p>
The impact of this ruling is that the prosecution does not need to prove that the driver was impaired.  In order to prosecute the motorist for DUI with Marijuana, as long as at least one of the two compounds can be identified in the DUI blood test evidence.    Another adverse impact is that a person may have used the Marijuana legally in another state, days or weeks prior to driving in Arizona, and still be arrested for Marijuana DUI.</p>



<p>
The Arizona Court of Appeals indicated that this ruling shall not be used to set precedent. However, this presents challenges in consistency for the courts since other cases similar to this are pending prosecution.</p>



<p><strong>Arizona Drug DUI Law</strong></p>



<p>
Currently under Arizona law <strong>A.R.S. 28-1381</strong> a person may be guilty of DUI under the following circumstances:
(1) While under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs while they are impaired to the slightest degree; or
(2)  If the person has an alcohol concentration of 0.08 percent or more, within two hours of driving or being in actual physical control of the vehicle and the alcohol was consumed either before or while driving or being in actual physical control of the vehicle; or
(3) While there is any drug defined in section A.R.S.13-3401 or its metabolite in the person’s body.</p>



<p>
A person driving under the influence of Marijuana could be arrested under items (1) or (3) depending on the circumstances of the Marijuana DUI.   It is not a defense if the person is a qualified Medical Marijuana user.</p>



<p>
<strong>Criminal Defense Attorney for Drug DUI charges Mesa, AZ </strong></p>



<p>
If you face any type of <a href="http://www.novakazlaw.com/DUIDefense/DUIwithDrugs.aspx">drug DUI </a>charges in Arizona, you should always consult a qualified criminal attorney to discuss your case.  Arizona has some of the most strict laws, and severe penalties for DUI conviction in the state.  Sentencing for drug DUI charges are the same or similar to those of drunk driving.  They include jail terms, suspension of driver’s license, probation, substance abuse screening and counseling; fines, fees, and assessments.  Other penalties may apply.   If retained an experienced criminal <a href="http://www.novakazlaw.com/ContactUs.aspx">lawyer</a> will protect your rights, and defend your charges.  There may be <a href="http://www.novakazlaw.com/DUIDefense.aspx">defenses </a>that you are not aware of that could lead to a dismissal of charges, or otherwise favorable outcome in your case.</p>



<p><strong>Additional Resources:</strong></p>



<p>
•   <a href="http://www.azleg.gov/ars/28/01381.htm">Arizona Drug DUI Laws</a></p>



<p>
•   <a href="http://azcourts.gov/coa1/Home.aspx">Arizona Court of Appeals Division 1</a></p>



<p>
•   <a href="http://www.azleg.state.az.us/ars/13/03401.htm">Arizona Drugs Defined Under Criminal Code</a></p>



<p>
•   <a href="http://www.mesaaz.gov/court/jurisdiction.aspx">Mesa AZ Municipal Court</a></p>



<p>
•   <a href="http://www.mesaaz.gov/police/Traffic/Default.aspx">Mesa AZ Police Department</a></p>



<p>If you “Like” this article please let us know with “+1”. Feel Free to subscribe and “Share”! Law Office of James Novak 4500 S. Lakeshore Drive Tempe AZ 85282 (480) 413-1499 Free Initial Consultation Arizona DUI, DWI, Drunk Driving & Criminal Defense Firm Serving Tempe, Phoenix, Mesa, Chandler, Gilbert, & Scottsdale AZ Maricopa County </p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>